Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 12:02:41 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-936482@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=aflyer@lazy8.net
From: John Huft <aflyer@lazy8.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Plasma III on Hi Compression Engines - Firewall Install
 Notes
References: <list-935475@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-935475@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Scott, I don't think this is right. My two run within about 0.25 degrees 
of each other. You should talk to Klaus about this.

My tach reading from the LSE reads100 rpm higher than my digital tach does.

John Huft


Craig Berland wrote:

> /"Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk wrote:
> 25 squared had the left timing displayed at 27 BTDC and the right at 
> 24.5 BTDC."/
>  
> Scott, I have enjoyed your info.  Question...does LSE believe a 
> staggered spark timing to be beneficial for power/economy?  I was 
> going to test this at GM but never had the chance.  My intuition said 
> any benefit real or imagined would be hard to measure, but as I 
> said...I was not able to test.
>  
> /"Scott said:The timing checks indicated a 3 degree retard (instead of 
> LSE's 5 degree recommendation)."/
> // 
> I'm willing to bet at a 5 deg retard you are giving up power and fuel 
> economy.  Unless you are detonation sensitive, I would expect no more 
> than a 2 deg retard on a 27 deg baseline for a 10 to 1 CR motor.  I 
> would be happy with the 3 deg shift.
> Craig Berland