In a message dated 5/5/2005 9:17:55 A.M. Central Standard Time,
genemartin@enid.com writes:
HI all,I bought a jpi edm at OSH. last year
but didn't instal the fuel flow antisapating a forward sump mod over the
winter, well the mod is nearly done and now it's time.JPI instructions say it
should mount in the hose between engine driven fuel pump and
servo,however I often see these in the metered hose at the flow
divider inlet, I was also told it is best to have as much straight hose as
possable on each side of transducer {no 45 or 90 degree
fittings} Is one location prefered, IT looks difficult to do the
straight thing on top of the
engine.
Gene,
OK, believe all those claims that straight lines before and after the flow
sensor count! But listen up grasshopper - it is the interface that
counts.
What? Blasphemy!
Yes, if one is going to use the throttle body to spider flow to measure
gph, you have chosen the correct path and will be rewarded with accurate
information. Yes, accurate if all absurdities are considered - take, for
example, the reducer that allows -4 lines to operate thru the -6
sensor. If you select the -4 flare to -6 pipe for the input side,
disaster will follow. If you choose a -4 to -6 reducer,
success will stick to you like peanut-butter to the roof of your mouth.
Why? One might ask.
'Cause the flare to pipe thread adapter has a small hole which
produces horrible turbulence, whilst the reducer just provides a large exit hole
for the fluid and any turbulence effect is eliminated.
Note that all the twists and turns of the flow towards the sensor are
nullified by the adapter to sensor interface. Trust me, been there, done
that.
Success has been found by those that mount the sensor horizontally or
vertically, as long as the flow is coherent into the sensor. Adaptrers
matter!
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)
Fair
and Balanced Opinions at No Charge!
Metaphysical Monologues used at your own
Risk.