Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:58:35 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP-TLS id 856895 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:21:24 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com Received: (qmail 31696 invoked by uid 2520); 6 Apr 2005 12:11:49 -0000 Received: from 216.107.97.170 by secure5.liveoakhosting.com (envelope-from , uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.83/762. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(216.107.97.170):. Processed in 0.098783 secs); 06 Apr 2005 12:11:49 -0000 Received: from 216-107-97-170.wan.networktel.net (HELO ?10.0.1.2?) (216.107.97.170) by secure5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 12:11:48 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--808630266 X-Original-Message-Id: From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Oil and warming up X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:20:39 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) --Apple-Mail-2--808630266 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Craig: The side loads at the very low rpms with cold oil are a factor in my=20 mind. If it drops 50 rpm, the prop governor is working! Now, in a=20 twin, I do cycle all the way down to be certain that the thing will=20 feather. Not the same concern as in a single. Walter On Apr 5, 2005, at 6:36 PM, Craig Berland wrote: Gene: **my engine builder ademently expressed that I not pull rpm down to much when cycleing prop, no more than 50rpm or I could scuff a piston on my low time tight cold engine.** ***That's actually very good advice on all engines of all times in=20 service.Walter*** =A0 Walter, the logic escapes me???=A0 I could see the concern if you were = at=20 WOT and pulled the prop back 800 RPM or so.=A0 But, 50 RPM at part throttle=20 during run up?? I would be more concerned that the prop governor did not work that the=20= engine being hurt by 150 RPM drop at part throttle. Craig Berland --Apple-Mail-2--808630266 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Craig: The side loads at the very low rpms with cold oil are a factor in my mind. If it drops 50 rpm, the prop governor is working! Now, in a twin, I do cycle all the way down to be certain that the thing will feather. Not the same concern as in a single. Walter On Apr 5, 2005, at 6:36 PM, Craig Berland wrote: Times New RomanGene: **my engine builder ademently expressed that I Times New Romannot pull rpm down to much when cycleing prop, no more than 50rpm or I Times New Romancould scuff a piston on my low time tight cold engine.** Times New Roman***That's actually very good advice on all engines of all times in service.Walter*** =A0 Times New RomanWalter, the logic escapes me???=A0 I could see the concern if you were at WOT and Times New Roman pulled the prop back 800 RPM or so.=A0 But, 50 RPM at part throttle during run up?? Times New RomanI would be more concerned that the prop governor did not work that the engine Times New Roman being hurt by 150 RPM drop at part throttle. Times New RomanCraig Berland --Apple-Mail-2--808630266--