Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:48:56 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP-TLS id 854263 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:52:39 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com Received: (qmail 17298 invoked by uid 2520); 4 Apr 2005 15:43:37 -0000 Received: from 216.107.97.170 by secure5.liveoakhosting.com (envelope-from , uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.83/762. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(216.107.97.170):. Processed in 0.1274 secs); 04 Apr 2005 15:43:37 -0000 Received: from 216-107-97-170.wan.networktel.net (HELO ?10.0.1.2?) (216.107.97.170) by secure5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 15:43:36 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18--968763188 X-Original-Message-Id: <4e1476f3f6c1ba2fa896b2143d7ec31a@advancedpilot.com> From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] CHT Measurement X-Original-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:51:46 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) --Apple-Mail-18--968763188 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mike: Uneven cylinder cooling is a big problem. It is not at all as uniform=20= as we would like. As a general rule, the hottest part is at the 6=20 o'clock position where the probe is... not always, but generally. =20 Some areas can be quite a bit cooler than others on one cylinder. That=20= is not good. It was that research that led us to create special=20 baffling to address this issue. Walter On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:03 AM, MikeEasley@aol.com wrote: Engine Guys, =A0 I know the engine doesn't=A0cool very evenly when on the ground.=A0 And = we=20 only measure CHT at one spot on the bottom of the cylinder.=A0 Is it=20 possible that some areas of our cylinders are getting much warmer, or=20 staying much cooler than the probe is reading?=A0 I'm assuming that, in=20= flight, that the cylinder temp is more even in all areas due to the=20 increased air flow.=A0 Could baffling (good or bad) send a high amount = of=20 air to where the probe is, not necessarily cooling the entire cylinder,=20= and make your number look good on your monitor, but really be cooking=20 your cylinder? =A0 Mike Easley Listening and Wondering --Apple-Mail-18--968763188 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mike: Uneven cylinder cooling is a big problem. It is not at all as uniform as we would like. As a general rule, the hottest part is at the 6 o'clock position where the probe is... not always, but generally.=20 Some areas can be quite a bit cooler than others on one cylinder.=20 That is not good. It was that research that led us to create special baffling to address this issue. Walter On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:03 AM, MikeEasley@aol.com wrote: ArialEngine = Guys, Arial=A0 ArialI know the engine doesn't=A0cool very evenly when on the ground.=A0 And we only measure = CHT at one spot on the bottom of the cylinder.=A0 Is it possible that some areas of our cylinders are getting much warmer, or staying much cooler than the probe is reading?=A0 I'm assuming that, in flight, that the cylinder temp is more even in all areas due to the increased air flow.=A0 Could baffling (good or bad) send a high amount of air to where the probe is, not necessarily cooling the entire cylinder, and make your number look good on your monitor, but really be cooking your cylinder? Arial=A0 ArialMike = Easley ArialListening and = Wondering --Apple-Mail-18--968763188--