Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:14:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta11.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.205] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 853255 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:02:16 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.205; envelope-from=glcasey@adelphia.net Received: from worldwinds ([68.64.124.3]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050403130130.ORAQ5402.mta11.adelphia.net@worldwinds> for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 09:01:30 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: Re: Oil and warming up X-Original-Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:58:46 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 <> I don't understand the statement about the "oil flow is minimal". Sure, the oil pressure regulator attempts to hold a constant pressure and since the viscosity is high the flow rate through the engine is somewhat reduced, but it's certainly not "minimal". Note that the biggest restriction in oil flow is in the main and rod bearings and that oil heats up very rapidly, thus allowing more oil to flow. Also, since the engine is cold why is "cooling oil" flow so important? Gary Casey