Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 09:33:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP-TLS id 852569 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 08:54:36 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com Received: (qmail 15028 invoked by uid 2520); 2 Apr 2005 13:46:25 -0000 Received: from 64.154.133.6 by secure5.liveoakhosting.com (envelope-from , uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.83/762. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(64.154.133.6):. Processed in 0.047251 secs); 02 Apr 2005 13:46:25 -0000 Received: from unknown.rni.net (HELO ?192.168.5.202?) (64.154.133.6) by secure5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2005 13:46:25 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-998844405 X-Original-Message-Id: <7ecea7d4389468f62839cf31cb5f757d@advancedpilot.com> From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Oil and warming up X-Original-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 07:53:50 -0600 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) --Apple-Mail-2-998844405 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On Apr 2, 2005, at 7:31 AM, Mark Ravinski wrote: Consider the stress when you cob in full power on a cold engine.=A0 = There=20 is little or no airflow yet=A0and the flow of cooling oil is minimal.=A0=20= The rapid heating will distort cylinders and change tolerances. The Lycoming book says that if the engine responds to advancing=20 throttle smoothly it's warm enough to go. Like other engine limits - this one borders on abuse. Mark: If you have any data to support that contention, I would really=20 appreciate seeing it. I know of no such data and do not share your=20 concern. As a matter of fact, waiting until the cylinders are a higher=20= temperature before takeoff, only serves to end up with a hotter CHT=20 during initial climb. I'd rather keep the cylinders cool. TCM,=20 Lycoming, Pratt & Whitney, and Wright all seem to agree with that. I=20 think they're right. Walter= --Apple-Mail-2-998844405 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Apr 2, 2005, at 7:31 AM, Mark Ravinski wrote: ArialConsider the stress when you cob in full power on a cold engine.=A0 There is little or no airflow yet=A0and the flow of cooling oil is minimal.=A0 The rapid heating will distort cylinders and change tolerances. ArialThe Lycoming book says that if the engine responds to advancing throttle smoothly it's warm enough to go. ArialLike other engine limits - this one borders on abuse. Mark: If you have any data to support that contention, I would really appreciate seeing it. I know of no such data and do not share your concern. As a matter of fact, waiting until the cylinders are a higher temperature before takeoff, only serves to end up with a hotter CHT during initial climb. I'd rather keep the cylinders cool. TCM, Lycoming, Pratt & Whitney, and Wright all seem to agree with that. I think they're right. Walter= --Apple-Mail-2-998844405--