Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:52:51 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from HQEMGATE01.nvidia.com ([216.228.112.170] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 759752 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:12:57 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.228.112.170; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from hqemfe02.nvidia.com (Not Verified[172.16.227.92]) by HQEMGATE01.nvidia.com id ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:12:55 -0800 Received: from hqemfe03.nvidia.com ([172.16.227.123]) by hqemfe02.nvidia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:12:12 -0800 Received: from thelma.nvidia.com ([172.16.228.84]) by hqemfe03.nvidia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:12:12 -0800 Received: from ccaselt (cvpn-16-233.nvidia.com [10.2.16.233]) by thelma.nvidia.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA22310 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:12:11 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Message-ID: <049001c51b87$0e8d8de0$6611020a@nvidia.com> From: "colyncase on earthlink" X-Original-To: Subject: LIVP wx500 antenna mounting question X-Original-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:12:11 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_048D_01C51B43.FF95E6E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Original-Return-Path: colyncase@earthlink.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2005 22:12:12.0455 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E4F7370:01C51B87] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_048D_01C51B43.FF95E6E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've heard of two positions that people have made to work: 1) way back on the bottom of the fuselage In this case, does the carbon fuselage and wing prevent the unit = from "seeing" strikes at or above the aircraft altitude? 2) at a wingtip. Has anyone got one of these flying? Is interference from the = strobe a problem? any other wisdom on the subject is welcome also. Colyn Case LIVP ------=_NextPart_000_048D_01C51B43.FF95E6E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've heard of two positions that people = have made=20 to work:

1) way back on the bottom of the=20 fuselage

In this case, does = the carbon=20 fuselage and wing prevent the unit from "seeing" strikes at or above the = aircraft altitude?

2) at a wingtip.

Has anyone got one = of these=20 flying? Is interference from the strobe a = problem?

any other wisdom on the subject is = welcome=20 also.

Colyn Case

LIVP

------=_NextPart_000_048D_01C51B43.FF95E6E0--