Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.242] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c2)
  with HTTP id 751688 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:33:47 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] FADEC Rough idle explanation
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c2
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:33:47 -0500
Message-ID: <web-751688@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E3425EE@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
References: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E3425EE@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "George Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com>:

  Want to try to define a list of what you think will be "better"  and why
  with FADEC than it will be with a well managed conventional engine?
  
  Hp ?
  
  BSFC ?
  
  CHT ?
  
  Price ?
  
  TBO ?
  
  Weight ?
  
  Other ?

"""
  I am a firm believer in the benefits of the FADEC system. However, I am
  just about at the end of my rope in trying to acquire one. I have been
  emailing and calling Mattituck, Aerosance, and TCM about getting a kit
  to upgrade my IO550-N7B. I can't even get anyone to return my calls, let
  alone give me a delivery date! I have a few more feelers out, and after
  that, I will reluctantly go back to mags and stock fuel injection.
   
  Adam Molny
  Legacy #151
  Installing rudder cables, teflon power everywhere!
"""