|
|
Posted for "George Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com>:
Most of the lawyers doing major aviation cases hold commercial or ATP
certificates, several with A & P tickets, and many with engineering degrees.
Many are ex- military and/or ex airline.
Your description of them as having “limited knowledge or understanding” is
characteristic of the near universal mis-understanding of what the real
world of this type of litigation is like - - rather than what you imagine.
I recently served as a 3rd arbiter in a complex aviation case. The three
arbiters had, between them, a few tens of thousands of hours scattered among
a few dozen complex aircraft types, a hundred combat missions, an
engineering degree or two, 75 years of trying lawsuits to jurors, and
several years of service on the bench as a judge.
I don’t think the result was a lot different than it would have been in
front of a jury.
Regards, George
"""
Let's don't forget the litigating attorneys with limited knowledge or
understanding orchestrating this symphony to its crescendo'd conclusion
(Movement #1 anyway) Remaining parts to be continued in the form of appeals.
--- more money for the liti-gators (not to be confused with their reptilian
first cousins residing in the FL swamplands.).
"""
|
|