Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:44:04 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-711266@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <jschroeder@perigee.net>
Received: from [166.82.201.17] (HELO smtp.perigee.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.9)
  with ESMTP id 711098 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:21:27 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.82.201.17; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net
Received: from john-study.home_wireless (dsl-208-26-41-119.perigee.net [208.26.41.119])
	by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j17FJuJ0014072
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:19:57 -0500
X-Original-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:20:04 -0500
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Brain Lock
References: <list-710830@logan.com>
From: "John Schroeder" <jschroeder@perigee.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Message-ID: <opslt17qdboo3lez@john-study.home_wireless>
In-Reply-To: <list-710830@logan.com>
User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3929)


> Of course, an independent A/P, like the Tru-Trak, uses its own internal  
> electronic gyros for stabilization.

Scott -

Totally agree with you. The combining of an A/P with the EFIS and having  
only one AHRS system for the whole works does not seem to be a wise move.  
It is definitely cheaper, but having a separate reference system for the  
A/P is well worth considering.

Always enjoy your commentary - wise, witty and well done.

Best,

John



--