Message

Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:48:18 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.202.55] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 656991 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:57:09 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.55; envelope-from=bjburr@mwheli.com Received: from vaio (c-67-177-10-27.client.comcast.net[67.177.10.27]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2005020314563701100cdhbje>; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:56:37 +0000 From: "Bryan J. Burr" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: MT vs Hartzell X-Original-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 07:51:44 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <00e001c509ff$e6aac970$0500a8c0@VAIO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00E1_01C509C5.3A4BF170" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00E1_01C509C5.3A4BF170 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MT has a new 3 bladed scimitar. Kirk Hammersmith installed it on his ES with the TSIO 550E engine and the Performance Engines power upgrades. He is getting excellent performance. I have the 4 bladed MT and the TSIO550E and the lower weight from the 3 bladed would be great to have during landing flare. The aft elevator is against the stop. I have heard the hartzell is a great prop and delivers more speed in cruise, and not as much climb rate, but with the TSIO550 engine and the heavy prop you may have some situations that are uncomfortable during landing. Bryan N132BB -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of MikeEasley@aol.com Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 6:32 AM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: MT vs Hartzell When I asked Tim about prop choice for my ES with the IO-550, he said the new scimtar Hartzell is the best way to go. It's a significant improvement over the old Hartzell design. I think weight would be the only reason to get the MT, certainly not performance. Mike Easley Colorado Springs ------=_NextPart_000_00E1_01C509C5.3A4BF170 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

MT has a new 3 bladed = scimitar. Kirk=20 Hammersmith installed it on his ES with the TSIO 550E engine and the = Performance=20 Engines power upgrades. He is getting excellent performance. = I have=20 the 4 bladed MT and the TSIO550E and the lower weight from the 3 = bladed=20 would be great to have during landing flare. The aft elevator is = against=20 the stop. I have heard the hartzell is a great prop and = delivers=20 more speed in cruise, and not as much climb rate, but = with the=20 TSIO550 engine and the heavy prop you may have some situations that are=20 uncomfortable during landing.

Bryan

N132BB

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair = Mailing List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of=20 MikeEasley@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 = 6:32=20 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: MT = vs=20 Hartzell

When I asked Tim about prop choice for my ES with the IO-550, he = said the=20 new scimtar Hartzell is the best way to go. It's a significant=20 improvement over the old Hartzell design. I think weight would = be the=20 only reason to get the MT, certainly not performance.

Mike Easley

Colorado Springs

------=_NextPart_000_00E1_01C509C5.3A4BF170--