Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:25:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta9.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with ESMTP id 412318 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:52:36 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.199; envelope-from=dfs155@adelphia.net Received: from f3g6s4 ([67.22.49.202]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040915185204.PBQS2583.mta9.adelphia.net@f3g6s4> for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:52:04 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <002e01c49b55$45f92da0$ca311643@losaca.adelphia.net> From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: Re: Fuel Fitting Thread Sealant X-Original-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:53:21 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Interesting, John. After my DAR finished the final (and only) inspection of my fresh 235 in 1993, we spent a lot of time discussing care and maintenance of my engine systems (including fuel), among other things, since he maintained a trainer fleet that used my type of engine. When he was done, he handed me a short squawk list - too many/too few threads showing on a bolt or two, replace a plastic insert nut with an all-steel one, things like that - and in that list, he noted that a couple of fuel line fittings were showing a little color right at the thread-to-thread interface. In each case, these were at the pipe threads, not at the flared junctions. Also, in each case, all the pipe-thread fittings had been tightened carefully per the appropriate AC but a couple still showed some seepage. The DAR recommended that I use Baker Seal on the pipe-threads and suggested that, if used per the instructions, it would solve the problem. I did so and it did. I figured that an old-time wrench like him ought to know. To be sure, I ran a substantial quantity of fuel through the system (about 30 gallons) and out through a filter (three layers of a paper filter material, liberated from a lab at my work, that caught everything larger than micron range gunk) and found NO contaminant from the Baker Seal. I did find a bit of other stuff, mainly a tiny amount of dirt and building debris, but no sealant. I guess if you slop the stuff on you could create a problem. Similar to the anti-seize compound used on the threads of spark plugs, if it's not applied correctly, e.g., starting a couple of threads back from the end, you've got a problem - and that stuff is used by every AP I have had work on my engine. Go figure. Dan Schaefer