Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.34.142.135] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2)
  with HTTP id 394619 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 21:04:58 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: MT Propellor
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 21:04:58 -0400
Message-ID: <web-394619@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20040905180144.01b56a70@pop-server.sc.rr.com>
References: <6.1.2.0.0.20040905180144.01b56a70@pop-server.sc.rr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "S. Reeves" <sreeves@sc.rr.com>:

  	Is there one dealer with better deals than the next?  Any recommendations?
  I think I am going to go with an MT and would like some input.  I know from
past discussions on the list that the 2 blade is more efficient in cruise, but
the 3 blade sure does look cool IMHO :p.  I have an O-320 E3D, does anyone
know if I can use the hydraulic model or will I have to get an electric.  I'm
sure these questions are better suited to be placed directly with MT, but I
know alot of you guys run those and any input would be appreciated.  Thanks
again.
  
  Steve Reeves
  Glasair I 343ND
  

[Hopefully Don Gordon will jump in here.. he has an MT 3-blade on his 320 and 
you're right, it certainly does look great.  I'm sure he could provide you 
with some performance data with which to form a decision.  Others with 2-blade 
setups could provide some counterpoint.  Good luck with whatever you choose. 
  <Marv>        ]