Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.34.142.135] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2)
  with HTTP id 394399 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:37:53 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] lml%20Web%20Archive
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:37:53 -0400
Message-ID: <web-394399@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <ABEDJLGBEGJNBCBGECGDKEOPCBAA.bbriton@platinum.ca>
References: <ABEDJLGBEGJNBCBGECGDKEOPCBAA.bbriton@platinum.ca>
X-Priority: 5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Barney Briton" <bbriton@platinum.ca>:

  Joe
  
  Your reference to "certified" engines hits a particular sore spot with me in
  regards to your Turbine engines.  Lancair's sells their Walter 601EX as a
  601E from the "Walter factory" as Factory new and Certified.  That fact of
  the matter is that this engine is an "experimental" engine that has been
  changed from the original 601E.  No mention of this fact has ever been
  portrayed from Lancair.  I would suggest full disclosure on Lancair's part
  to it's customers is a better and less legally contigous route to follow.  I
  would ask what kind of testing data is available from Walter on the 601EX in
  regards to reliability and TBO?
  
  I would also suggest that an email forum is not a place to be hashing out
  differences between individuals and companies.  It is far too easy to type
  something into an email that would never be attempted to be said face to
  face. Just my opinion.
  
  Barney Britton
  IVPT 95%