Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:41:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta9.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 384492 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:20:21 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.199; envelope-from=glcasey@adelphia.net Received: from worldwinds ([68.169.130.102]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040830131950.SBXW2583.mta9.adelphia.net@worldwinds> for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:19:50 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: Engine Cooling X-Original-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:13:31 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal I'm about to figure out the cooling system on my ES, so all the recent postings on cooling were very interesting, although none seemed to impart any take-it-home factual information. From what I can tell, there are no real "secrets" on cooling systems, only a lot of obscure facts. Here is what I have gathered about the issue: 1. Pressure recovery (converting the high velocity free-stream to low velocity higher pressure air with minimum energy loss) is critical and it looks like the Lancair cowl does this ahead of the entrance as the cowl openings are larger than they could be. This is probably a good, efficient approach. However, once the air enters the cowl, no attention at all was given to pressure recovery. Should there be? I think so. The idea is to get maximum pressure above the engine. 2. Eliminate all wasted air flow across the engine, primarily by eliminating any leakage paths. This is the most obvious point and one on which everyone seems to agree. 3. Control of air flow patterns inside the cowl is important, but here again it looks like Lancair (and most other airframe builders) have given no thought at all to this. Their assumption must have been that once the air is inside the cowl it will just magically get to where it needs to go. The air at this point is at a relatively low velocity so this as some validity, but I'm not convinced. 4. Exactly how the air gets around the cylinders has to be critical and this seems to be done mostly by the engine-manufacturer-provided baffles, but I'm not convinced these are optimized either. The most important airflow around the engine has to be across the fins between the valves and I've never seen any directed effort at maximizing this flow path. My judgment is that the temperature around the cylinder head is nowhere near constant, but how does one improve upon this? 5. And finally, the airflow in the lower cowl has to be managed. In most systems I see zero effort in this regard. Even Lancair, although they went to the trouble to provide a curved, converging flow path at the top of the cowl outlets, put sharp edges at the sides, which accounts for more than half the entrance periphery. As I see it, the objective of the first four points above is to cool the engine while allowing the HIGHEST lower cowl pressure to be maintained. This pressure can then used as the energy source to accelerate the air back up to somewhere near free-stream velocity, but it can only do that if the exit nozzles are efficient. I would appreciate any discussion on these points. Gary Casey