Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.164.105] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2) with HTTP id 382348 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:21:36 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Revortex generators To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:21:36 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <413106FA.336C20A8@airmail.net> References: <413106FA.336C20A8@airmail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for beech1@airmail.net: I was kinda hoping to enhance it. I understand through tuft testing others have done that separation of the laminar foil begins @ approximately 30 to 35% back on the chord and that placement there could be a great improvement in the low speed range. More interestingly the manufacturer (of the VG's) feels the most help would be in the placement of the VG's on the lower horizontal just forward of the elevator keeping my small tail alive longer. I have no clue as I'm just a driver looking for all the input I can get before deciding. The one person I have talked to that has them, loves em, but he bought the a/c with them and has no "before" experience. I don't want to slow her down but if the low speed qualities could be noticeably improved on I might be willing to sacrifice a knot or three. On occasion she still gets my blood racing in the landing phase. I agree though, sure is a pretty wing to be gluing blemishes to. Michael LNC2 N360GT