Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.164.105] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2) with HTTP id 381660 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:47:16 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LOP vs ROP Baffle -Cooling - Fuel flow To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:47:16 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Sky2high@aol.com: [Regarding]: Paul Tackabury post and George Braly's reply. I think these are going off in the wrong direction. Lurkers and contributors have benefitted greatly from the SHARING of information here on the LML. The engine set-up was purchased and George is under no obligation to provide us information about what he did (independent of the fact that the LML may have sent much business his way) - Indeed, the purchaser "owns" that information and George may be obligated to not inform others about what he did. The "purchaser" may also have benefitted from ideas shared on the LML - maybe he is just a lurker and has chosen not to share any information --- maybe not. Maybe someone else has tweaked their IV's engine installation and have produced results as good as George - after all, these are experimental aircraft. And, maybe that someone would be willing to share what was done to improve the fuel flow and cooling and ..... I can't believe all the IV's, ES's, Legacy's (those powered by 6-cyls) are suffering from the same engine installation ills. Also, remember that if you are normally aspirated, not all inter cylinder fuel flow discrepancies are solely solved with Gami injectors -- there are other ways. If you have solved such problems with "tuned" injectors, remember that later changes to air flow and pressures in the cooling plenum may change the results. Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Sky2high@aol.com II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL (KARR) Opinions and results may vary! In a message dated 8/27/2004 5:20:27 PM Central Standard Time, gwbraly@gami.com writes: Hey George: Regards your baffle business for LIVs--you have made the claim that "every single IV-P's I have seen were very poorly baffled and the fuel set up was improper" many times. And of course you always add that "I took one of these "stock" IV-P's and fixed it. It took a fair amount of time and effort, and a lot of experience to know what to do and how". OK, so you and Gami are the smartest bunch in the world, but to suggest that you know a secret that would provide all of us dummies building LIVs a better engine installation and never share the details, well it has become tiring. If you want to sell this magic, offer it as a product. If you want to be real helpful, provide a drawing. Speaking as one who continues to refine my LIV engine installation, the Lancair provided baffle kit seems a well thought out, good fitting collection of bits of heavy gauge aluminum. Of course as is the case with all mysteries of air cooled engines and cowling drag, it probably could be improved upon. So while my grinders and tin cutters are handy, let me know what to do. Please do not wait until I publish my performance numbers on this list and then tell me I did it wrong. Paul Tackabury, LIV in primer ************************************************************** Paul, I confess to having written that message in language that was harsher than I would prefer. Also, keep in mind that I begged the owner of the plane that I fixed NOT to get me involved with that project. I said I didn’t have time. He said, “There are lots of L IVP’s out there that need fixing.” I said, yes, but they are all homebuilt aircraft, and with only a few exceptions, the owners will simply copy anything I try to do or build, and so there is no point in getting distracted from my other certified activities that pay the bills. e said, “ how long will it take.” I said I don’t know, but if I tried to do it, it would take at least a month or two to work it in with everything else. e said, “… how much.” I said I don’t know. The owner then basically said, “… here are the keys and I will write you a blank check. Please proceed, and let me know when you get it finished.” After it was done, successfully, somebody on the forum posted up a message and said, in effect, “heck, I can buy six new cylinders to replace the red hot cylinders that I am running with now, for what that cost.” He had a point, if you want to treat the machinery that way from now on. I can’t tell you what to do, because I don’t know what you have already done and what your existing configuration is. e are not the “smartest bunch in the world.” I appreciate the sentiment if it was sincere and if it was meant to be sarcastic, that’s OK, because I probably deserved it for the blunt manner in which I posted up the message. OTOH, I have spent the better part of the last eight years and a whole lot of money studying this particular subject. What I do know is that there is absolutely NO REASON why all of these planes should not perform as well as the plane that we modified two years ago. The point to my message was to try to impress upon the owners of these wonderful airplanes that there is a world of unrealized performance in these airplanes, and they should not accept the status quo for the indefinite future. Regards, George