Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.171.36.121] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2)
  with HTTP id 380497 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:17:26 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LOP vs ROP
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:17:26 -0400
Message-ID: <web-380497@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E1F4F8D@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
References: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E1F4F8D@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "George Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com>:
  
  Well...  again,  every single IV-P's I have seen were very poorly baffled 
and
the fuel set up was improper.
  
  The result is, frankly,  a lousy engine installation that results in the
operational limitations you describe - - and which are wholly unnecessary.
  
  
  You guys should be having routine  full power climbs from sea level to 
20,000
feet in 10 minutes and never see a CHT above 380F.
  
  Cruise should routinely be at 32 to 34" MP and 2300 to 2500 RPM and 70-90F
LOP, again with the hottest CHT under 380F.
  
  And, yes,  it can be done.   I took one of these "stock"  IV-P's and fixed
it.  It took a fair amount of time and effort, and a lot of experience to know
what to do and how.
  
  Regards,  George