Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 23:51:12 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rly-ip05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 366279 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:50:44 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.9; envelope-from=WarbirdAeroPress@cox.net Received: from smtp-mtc08.proxy.aol.com (smtp-mtc08.proxy.aol.com [64.12.118.84]) by rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (v98.19) with ESMTP id RELAYIN3-4412019966; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:19:02 -0400 Received: from DELL (ACA70D40.ipt.aol.com [172.167.13.64]) by smtp-mtc08.proxy.aol.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i7G2Isig014157 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:19:00 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <001c01c48337$6037dc10$400da7ac@DELL> From: "Scotty G" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 360 Small Tail Flight Characteristics X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 19:18:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01C482FC.B31E8DB0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 X-Apparently-From: AeroServ@aol.com X-AOL-IP: 64.12.118.84 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C482FC.B31E8DB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Scott, Mark and all... This is EXACTLY the information I am looking for. THANK YOU all for your = input! Wonderful. I feel like part of the group already. Looking forward = to learning more and getting to know you all. I'm going to take a look = at the bellcrank and bobweight construction when I get back off my trip. = I don't mind the pitch sensitivity, to me it is just going to be = something to get used to. There are drawbacks to almost all aircraft, = and this is one with the Lancair in the config that I have. About the shimmy... Maybe I made it sound like it was doing it all the = time. Hardly. Just once in a while when I don't keep the nose light with = backpressure on rollout. I still think I should probably have it looked = at? Scotty G Dago Red Unlimited Air Race Team WarbirdAeroPress.com All mail is scanned for viruses. ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C482FC.B31E8DB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Scott, Mark and all...
 
This is EXACTLY the information I am looking for. = THANK YOU=20 all for your input! Wonderful. I feel like part of the group already. = Looking=20 forward to learning more and getting to know you all. I'm going to take = a look=20 at the bellcrank and bobweight construction when I get back off my trip. =
 
I don't mind the pitch sensitivity, to me it is just = going to=20 be something to get used to. There are drawbacks to almost all aircraft, = and=20 this is one with the Lancair in the config that I have.
 
About the shimmy... Maybe I made it sound like it = was doing it=20 all the time. Hardly. Just once in a while when I don't keep the nose = light with=20 backpressure on rollout. I still think I should probably have it looked=20 at?
 
Scotty G
Dago Red Unlimited Air Race=20 Team
WarbirdAeroPress.com
 
All mail is scanned for = viruses.
------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C482FC.B31E8DB0--