Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 22:19:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.tsnci.com ([65.78.205.250] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 358722 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 20:22:30 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.78.205.250; envelope-from=WeinsweigD@tsnci.com Received: from TSNC_DOM-MTA by mail.tsnci.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 20:24:52 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.1 X-Original-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 20:24:21 -0400 From: "Dr. Weinsweig" X-Original-To: Subject: [LML] Re: Stopping the prop after engine failure Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline hi all- my condolences to shannon's family. it saddens me and i'm sure the rest of our community whenever tragedy strikes. although i do not profess to be an expert in these areas yet, i can state from personal experience that it does not take an excessive speed to start a prop windmilling from a complete stop, recently, i did a tailslide at approximately 10,000 ft msl(intentional) in my extra 300l(lycoming 540-300hp) at the top of my tailslide i found myself in total silence looking at the sky and seeing 3 totally stopped prop blades which caught my attention as i had never seen that before. i flopped over pointing straight to the ground. it took what seemed like an eternity for the prop to start turning again though i suspect it was only seconds and around a thousand feet of elevation loss but i doubt that the ias was much more than 120 kts(and perhaps less) at that time though i cannot say this with 100% certainty as i was just very happy that the prop started turning and the engine restarted! fwiw. very interesting threads-learning with every post! david weinsweig lancair propjet n750dw reserved to close fuselage on saturday