Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 10:50:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.46] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3148632 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:01:04 -0400 Received: from 209-165-23.202.lightspeed.net ([209.165.23.202] helo=earthlink.net) by grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BAqCN-0003Gd-00 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 06:01:04 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <4072AA1B.7080406@earthlink.net> X-Original-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:01:15 -0400 From: Capt D User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: lml Sun 'n Fun Traffic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Living in FL, I have flown into S 'n F several times. As you are aware, a combination of pilots who can barely fly, definitely don't read Notams, and can't navigate is a dangerous combination. The 100 KT flight lane, frequently sees Cessnas that think 80 KTS is close enough. Combine that with missing the flight corridor to the airport, and that can cause massive backups, the controllers do close the approach if it gets really screwed up (ie holding). In a fast plane, I would seriously consider using the higher approach corridor, and getting more attention from 'approach'. Given the proper caution and preparation, flying into the event can be a good thing. Especially if you're in a nice experimental ac. Regards, D. Story