Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:56:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3147898 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:29:48 -0400 Received: from P4DESKTOP ([68.218.145.54]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with SMTP id <20040406032948.ZXBW1763.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@P4DESKTOP> for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 23:29:48 -0400 From: "Douglas W. Johnson, MD" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Sun 'n Fun X-Original-Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 23:31:25 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <008301c41b87$a47f2f30$0f01a8c0@P4DESKTOP> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0084_01C41B66.1D6D8F30" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01C41B66.1D6D8F30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have flown the "low speed" approach into LAL for the last 7 years in my IVP without difficulty. It is not nearly as hairy as OSH. Doug Johnson N654DM -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Ian Crowe Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 10:08 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Sun 'n Fun I came in on the tail of the discussion of the approach streams to OSH and which is the most suitable for our planes. Presuming the same logic applies to LAL which stream would a Lancair 360 use? My common sense tells me I should be in the upper, faster stream as I would have difficulty in following some of the slower A/C at speeds well below 100knots. What do my more experienced brethren do? This is my first time at LAL and I would like to go in at least this time. Maybe next time I would drive!!! Help please. Ian Crowe C-FKRO ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01C41B66.1D6D8F30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have=20 flown the "low speed" approach into LAL for the last 7 years in my IVP = without=20 difficulty. It is not nearly as hairy as OSH.

Doug=20 Johnson

N654DM

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing = List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Ian = Crowe
Sent:=20 Monday, April 05, 2004 10:08 PM
To: Lancair Mailing=20 List
Subject: [LML] Sun 'n Fun

I came in on the tail of the = discussion of the=20 approach streams to OSH and which is the most suitable for our=20 planes.

Presuming the same logic applies to = LAL which=20 stream would a Lancair 360 use? My common sense tells me I = should be in=20 the upper, faster stream as I would have difficulty in following some = of the=20 slower A/C at speeds well below 100knots.

What do my more experienced brethren = do? =20 This is my first time at LAL and I would like to go in at least this=20 time. Maybe next time I would drive!!!

Help please.

Ian Crowe

C-FKRO

------=_NextPart_000_0084_01C41B66.1D6D8F30--