Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:27:03 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-3122249@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <yacht-pool@forsikring.dk>
Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 3122147 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:47:21 -0500
Received: from forsikring.dk (unknown [194.192.150.22])
	by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B7747FE20
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:47:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-Message-ID: <40638C5A.AC29BCAB@forsikring.dk>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:50:18 +0100
From: Tim Jorgensen <yacht-pool@forsikring.dk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Aerobatic prop on 360
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Q: Does anyone use an aerobatic ( HC-C2YK-4CF or equiv.) prop on a 360
and, if so, is it a happy marriage?

Tim Jorgensen
360FB /  35%