Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:50:16 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [24.116.0.122] (HELO mail.cableone.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3083908 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:28:15 -0500 Received: from Wendell (unverified [24.117.187.210]) by smail2.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 12039775 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:18:30 -0700 X-Original-Return-Path: X-Original-Message-ID: <000a01c40c90$b065c4e0$9865fea9@Wendell> From: "Wendell & Jean Durr" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Metallic paint effect on radio function X-Original-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:28:24 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C40C5E.657C98A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C40C5E.657C98A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does anybody have any words of wisdom as to whether or not metallic = paint would interfere with the function of internal antennae (really = just a VOR/LOC/GS antenna) in a Legacy? Thanks. Wendell = Durr ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C40C5E.657C98A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Does anybody have any words of wisdom = as to whether=20 or not metallic paint would interfere with the function of internal = antennae=20 (really just a VOR/LOC/GS antenna) in a Legacy? =20 Thanks. Wendell=20 Durr

------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C40C5E.657C98A0--