Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:46:24 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from JSC-EMS-VWS02.jsc.nasa.gov ([139.169.16.51] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 2708312 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:43:13 -0500 Received: from jsc-smtp02.jsc.nasa.gov ([139.169.16.60]) by 139.169.16.51 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:32:37 -0600 Received: by jsc-smtp02.jsc.nasa.gov with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:32:37 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: From: "THORN, VALIN B. (JSC-OM) (NASA)" X-Original-To: 'Lancair Mailing List' Subject: Closing Surfaces With Epoxy/Flox Vs. Hysol? X-Original-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:32:31 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain Regarding: " Lancair IV kit pre-buy inspection... I think they closed all surfaces with epoxy and flox instead of hysol... Pass it by. This is a major structural concern. Bill Harrelson" _______________________________________________________________________ Hmmmm... at our Legacy builder's assistance workshop I asked Mark Mahnke what the considerations were for use of epoxy/flox vs. Hysol. Mark said the only difference is when you need more time to work. Since then I remember someone on the list saying that the peel strength of Hysol is greater than epoxy/flox. I'm wondering, though, just what are the latest opinions of the experts out there on what applications are most appropriate for Hysol and epoxy/flox? Valin Thorn Legacy Houston, Texas BTW, we closed out our wings, horizontal stabilizer, and elevators with Hysol. Our fuselage to center wing section bonding and load path reinforcements were with epoxy/flox.