Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:54:02 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2444586@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <msmith@cervicalspinespecialists.com>
Received: from [209.98.52.17] (HELO HLM_Exchange.HLM)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b8)
  with ESMTP id 2444551 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:16:59 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <6FA98AC6B173D41180670090272AB8C538A764@HLM_Exchange.HLM>
From: Michael Smith <msmith@cervicalspinespecialists.com>
X-Original-To: 'Lancair Mailing List' <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Stormscope or not?
X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:10:32 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

My experience with a Strikefinder in my IV is that it is superb and very
reliable.  range and intensity is right on.  The only problem I have is the
B&C stand by alternator cause a bilobed radial splash of strikes from
100-200 nm range.  I put a condenser on for filtering and all it did was
change the orientation from the 1 o'clock and 7 o'clock position to the 2 to
8 o'clock position.

Michael Smith