Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:54:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [67.29.153.40] (HELO dparsons.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b8) with ESMTP id 2443429 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:39:25 -0400 Received: from QAUDAP1800 [38.113.130.49] by dparsons.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.00) id ACA5F87008E; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:40:37 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <00c001c33b49$169068c0$831ca8c0@QAUDAP1800> Reply-To: "Don Parsons" From: "Don Parsons" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Personnel Exodus X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:39:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 > Decide which you want and "just do it". Life's too short to wait. To continue with that thought, I can't tell you how many builders over the years I have heard state that they really wish that they had started their project sooner. I happen to be one of them, but I don't really worry about it. I agree, the two strongest kit manufacturers in the market today are Lancair and Van's (IMO). Regarding some of the other discussion about changes at Lancair... I have had some fairly recent conversations with people inside of Lancair (since Joe purchased the company), and I anticipate some changes that will address some of the points of contention builders have had for a while. Right now the company is going through some changes, and that uncertainty is unsettling for some. But change and uncertainty CAN be a road to improvements. I must say that I am disappointed to hear about some of the specific departures, but I also know something about the new players, and I have faith that it won't be long before many will be to the point that they could not imagine being able to continue without those individuals as well. Having personally been in a similar position, in a different company, in a different industry, the best thing we can do for now is be patient. I have observed something here that I have seen before with a company I worked for years ago. Companies like Lancair have customers that are not just consumers, but passionate fans. Those are the ones that tend to be the most alarmed by the possible impact of change. As with Lancair, there came a time when the "brightest minds" of that company departed, and many feared that those loses were the beginning of the end. With my 20/20 hindsight, I see that new minds entered the picture, and the company has gone in better directions than ever before. Lancair, and it's staff need time to adjust. Offering constructive criticism can be helpful if done professionally, and respectfully. Don Parsons ES-166-FB