Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:50:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7) with ESMTP id 1730773 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:43:25 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id H2A3BK08.805 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:38:08 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: ram air X-Original-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:36:24 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> I haven't gotten to the point where I need to do something about this, but here are some thoughts: Bypassing the filter at altitude may be a reasonable thing to do, but to really capture "ram air" I think you need to do more than just pick up pressure in the cowl. The pressure above the engine in the cowl is probably not very close to the maximum pressure available. To really get ram air you probably need to provide a separate inlet that is as close to the propeller as possible. As in some of the 320/360's where the builder has extended the inlet forward. Then the ram air valve has to be made so that it shuts off the passage to the air filter when it opens to ram air, thus avoiding the venting of the pressure through the filter. The Mooney's did it wrong, too, as they were built to essentially just bypass the filter - ram air pressure wasn't captured because the air could flow backwards through the filter. I plan to use an oversize filter and plumb it directly to a ram air source and not have a valve. Alternate air will be through a spring-load door just like on my C177. Simplicity. Gary Casey