Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:14:27 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1686859@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <naf@britevalley.com>
Received: from mail.san.yahoo.com ([209.132.1.30] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6)
  with ESMTP id 1686864 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:06:14 -0400
Received: from paul (206.71.105.185) by mail.san.yahoo.com (6.5.026.2) (authenticated as naf@britevalley.com)
        id 3D5795A60004D39A for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:04:19 -0700
From: "Paul Nafziger" <naf@britevalley.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Boost pump use?
X-Original-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:05:20 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <EGEMIAGHIJKLHFMFNNDMOEHACDAA.naf@britevalley.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <list-1686699@logan.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal

<<Thought that was something taught to all fledglings by a good instructor -
any time you'd be in deep yogurt if the mechanical pump failed and you
wouldn't have time to re-establish fuel flow before the ground comes up to
smite you.>>>

Dan,

Don't know that I was ever taught that--jets don't seem to have the problem.
Although I think the header tank provides pretty good insurance, I do use it
for any low altitude work, including patterns.  Just wondered what everybody
else did.

Naf