Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 01:10:59 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6) with ESMTP id 1685558 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 20:28:17 -0400 Received: from 216-164-237-165.s419.tnt3.frdb.va.dialup.rcn.com ([216.164.237.165] helo=OFFICE) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #6) id 17dK77-0007V1-00 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 20:28:17 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <04df01c24005$1a437d80$53eca4d8@OFFICE> From: "Bill & Sue" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] H Stab incidence on LNC2 X-Original-Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 20:30:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 > > Is the recommeneded incidence for the 320/360 still -1/2 > to -1 deg? Does anyone have a good reason to deviate > from that? > Dan, I tried to put the incidence right in the middle of the recommended range. It worked our well. In cruise, my elevator is exactly faired with the h.stab. Follow the book recommendation on this one. Bill harrelson@erols.com N5ZQ LNC2 O-320