Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 19:10:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com ([204.127.198.38] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6) with ESMTP id 1685219 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 10:39:43 -0400 Received: from rwcrwbc56 ([204.127.198.45]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20020809143942.ZYJQ19356.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@rwcrwbc56> for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:39:42 +0000 Received: from [156.153.254.67] by rwcrwbc56; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 14:39:42 +0000 From: olsen25@attbi.com X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: H Stab incidence on LNC2 X-Original-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 14:39:42 +0000 X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Apr 29 2002) X-Original-Message-Id: <20020809143942.ZYJQ19356.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@rwcrwbc56> Dear 320/360 builders, I have seen a fair amount of discussion about the incidence of the Lancair ES H Stab over the last year or two, but I don't recall any new recommendations for the 320/360. Is the recommeneded incidence for the 320/360 still -1/2 to -1 deg? Does anyone have a good reason to deviate from that? Regards, Dan Olsen