Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 15:04:10 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1249836 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 28 May 2002 14:23:41 -0400 Received: from gcf01.goldenchoice.com ([64.169.195.138]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 28 May 2002 14:18:30 -0400 Received: by GCF01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <2HSS2312>; Tue, 28 May 2002 11:20:46 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <91E082850064D411895600A024C85D0D07A73B@GCF01> From: Joe X-Original-To: "'Lancair. List (E-mail)" Subject: Vacuum vs Electric Panel X-Original-Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 11:20:45 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" The two issues really are cost and do you fly much IFR. An all electric panel is quite a bit more than a vacuum panel. Also, it weighs more, two batteries, two alternators, more wire, etc. If your autopilot works off of the Turn Coordinator rather than the HIS when you loose the vacuum pump - o problem. All in all both work just fine. It's just money and weight. PS This time around I spent the money and added the weight. Joe