Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.2) with ESMTP id 1033498 for rob@logan.com; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:02:47 -0500 Received: from femail48.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.42]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:36:12 -0500 Received: from cc1860069a ([68.62.25.175]) by femail48.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20020130143807.QUNN19274.femail48.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cc1860069a> for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 06:38:07 -0800 Message-ID: <000001c1a99b$d3632640$af193e44@rocsth01.mi.comcast.net> From: "Edmond de Chazal" To: "Lancair List" References: <20020129061212.AAA6201@pop3.olsusa.com> Subject: High speed vibration in a 360 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:22:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Well, after a year and a half, I've just about removed all of the known bugs from my 360. The ELT triggering from COM2 should be fixed now that I've relocated the antenna away from the COM2 antenna and I've finally gotten the canopy rollover sealed (with half inch quarter round rubber extrusion). The heat in the airplane is more than adequate if the canopy's sealed it turns out. There's one remaining 'characteristic' that concerns me. At 195 - 200 kts indicated, there is a vibration that suddenly comes in. I can hear it (low frequency) as well as feel it. I feel it more through the seat than the controls. It's disconcerting enough to cause me to immediately reduce speed. This is well into the yellow arc and only achievable by going downhill with cruise power (which is how I found it). Have any of you with 360s encountered this? How far into the yellow arc have you guys flown? All of my control surfaces are balanced (although I did not personally confirm this after paint - the painter said they were fine). I noticed this problem prior to painting anyway, and paint did not affect it. This plane has the large tail. The vertical fin has probably more mass than stock due to one side needing to be built out to fit with the rudder (the trailing edge of the fin was too narrow and off center relative to the rudder). A substantial rudder trim tab was needed. On the other hand, the rudder weighs less since all of the lead is in the counterweight nose and none along the leading edge (balance was achieved by extending the counterweight nose.) So the tail did not go together as cleanly as I would have hoped and might be a problem source. Or maybe it's gear doors flapping somehow. Or.... Any thoughts out there? Regards, Ed de Chazal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>