Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.2) with ESMTP id 1030680 for rob@logan.com; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 07:47:37 -0500 Received: from snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.62]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 04:33:24 -0500 Received: from sdn-ar-012orportp329.dialsprint.net ([63.180.48.107] helo=f3g6s4) by snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16U2lK-00020Z-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 01:35:10 -0800 Message-ID: <000e01c1a583$d5750780$6b30b43f@f3g6s4> Reply-To: "Dan Schaefer" Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: "Dan Schaefer" To: "Lancair list" Subject: Re: Constant speed prop Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 01:36:56 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> FWIW. Aircraft with the wide useable speed range of the Lancairs (all types) can really use a CS prop, if for no other reason than take-off performance. For the first couple hundred hours on my 235 (O-235-L2C with the Lyc high compression pistons, giving about 120 - 125 HP at sea level), I ran a fixed pitch wooden prop pitched for cruise. This prop was set up to give about 2650 RPM, WOT at 7500 to 9500 ft. which seemed to be the best setup for this earlier LNC2. Typical cruise speed was right at 160 kts. Unfortunately, the best take-off RPM achievable at sea level with this setup was a meager 2350 RPM, and since shaft horsepower is directly related to RPM, I gave up a lot during the take-off. (There are a couple of "bite marks" on my seat upholstery to attest to this). Typical of a slippery airplane like the Lancair, once I got airborne and gingerly coaxed the airspeed up to about 130 (MPH), the RPM began to come up and the ROC always went up to around 1000 + FPM. I then installed a MT electric CS prop which allowed the engine to produce 2650 - 2700 RPM at the start of the roll (engine red-line is 2800 continuous). Full gross weight take-offs became non-events, following the installation. Fuel flow during take-off and climb out went up by nearly 50% and the consensus is that I must be making quite a bit more power during that phase of flight. Cruise speed, at approx. 2550 RPM, at the above mentioned altitudes, went up by a few kts (fuel flow settled down to the normal rate seen with the fixed prop) but even if airspeed had stayed the same, the improved take-off performance is worth every penny! Cheers, Dan Schaefer N235SP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>