Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 874349 for rob@logan.com; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 20:14:20 -0400 Received: from mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au ([203.2.75.171]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:41:49 -0400 Received: from user ([198.142.255.41]) by mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f92NrPs28194 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 09:53:26 +1000 Message-ID: <000c01c14b9c$08542c40$29ff8ec6@user> From: "Robert Overmars" To: "lancair list" Subject: new engine concept. Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 09:41:59 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> We all know how inefficient the fuel cooled piston/crankshaft engines we have today are. With exhaust gas temperatures that make exhaust pipes and turbos glow red in the dark it's obvious that most of the energy available blows away in the exhaust; along with all the heat that must be dissapated by engine cooling, this doesn't leave a great percentage of the energy available in the fuel to drive the prop (or wheels of your car or whatever). Rotary engines are much the same. Diesel engines are better but are typically bulky and heavy although some of the up and coming designs are better. Turbines are worse, but make lots of power in light weight fuel hungry packages. For an intermittent combustion engine all other factors being equal, the engine with the greatest expansion ratio (the backside of the compression ratio) is the more efficient engine. A turbo-charged Continental TSIO 550, expansion ratio of 1:7.5 is not as fuel efficient as a normally aspirated 550 with an expansion ratio of 1:8.5. A diesel engine with an expansion ratio of 1:17 is more efficient again despite having to do work to compress and heat air to a temperature hot enough to ignite the fuel. There are (large) stationary diesel engines with expansion ratios of 1:30 that have fuel efficiencies around 50%. There are lots of attempts being made to build useful engines with higher expansion ratios. Saab of Sweden build a variable compression (ie expansion) engine that at low power outputs has an expansion ratio of 1:14. At high power outputs low compression is used because of the problem of detonation. There are attempts being made to develope gasoline powered compression ignition engines to get to the fuel efficiencies of diesel engines. But all these attempts come up against the fundamental problem of detonation, setting the limits for the expansion ratio and hence the fuel efficiency of the engine. Even diesel engines, to become more fuel efficient need higher compression ratios (doing more and more work compressing to become fuel efficient!) Obviously the piston/crankshaft engine has fundamental limits that limit it's potential fuel efficiency. So an entirely different approach is needed. For some years I have played with ideas and have developed an entirely new engine concept. It is simple in design, has a low parts count, is light weight, is balanced and inherently low in vibration, has a very high expansion ratio of over 1:200 giving very high fuel efficiency and very low EGTs, (those with knowledge of gas law can no doubt give exact figures but my estimate is 150' C plus/minus 50'), is inherently low in internal friction, is modular and scaleable, each stage producing power output for over 300 degrees of each rotation giving deliciously high torque at propellor friendly low rpm. It is air start so there is no heavy starter and battery needed, is multi fuel capable and with careful combustion chamber design emissions can be kept very low. And to the best of my knowledge (after much searching) there are no patents on anything similar. It is time now to turn this concept into hardware. So I am looking for a person or persons with the interest and resources to make a partnership to do so. If any of you out there have the interest please do contact me. Robert rovermars@optusnet.com.au >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>