Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b8) with ESMTP id 321979 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 01:58:34 -0400 Received-SPF: error receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.33; envelope-from=ALVentures@cox.net Received: from BigAl ([68.107.116.221]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040715055800.GYSN26045.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@BigAl> for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 01:58:00 -0400 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: New Scoop Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:58:25 -0700 Message-ID: <000b01c46a30$be3bc8a0$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C469F6.11DCF0A0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C469F6.11DCF0A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Scoop=20 =20 Al, What kind and size of radiator(s) are you using. I assume that there = are 2 of them, but maybe not. I like the set up, and I can see where the flow would be very even. That type of set up would be a major change from = what I have now. =20 =20 Steve=20 =20 Yeah; you don't want to go there at this point. I was just showing the setup as an example. And I haven't flown it yet, so the evidence isn't = in. I tend to spend a fair amount of time in the design and engineering = because I hate to go back and fix things that don't work. Can't guarantee it = saves time in the long run because there are usually some surprises in real = life. =20 Al ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C469F6.11DCF0A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Scoop

Al,

What = kind and size of radiator(s) are you using. I assume that there are 2 of them, = but maybe not. I like the set up, and I can see where the flow would = be very even. That type of set up would be a major change from what I have = now.

Steve

Yeah; you don’t want to go = there at this point. I was just showing the setup as an example. = And I haven’t flown it yet, so the evidence isn’t in. I tend to spend a = fair amount of time in the design and engineering because I hate to go back = and fix things that don’t work. Can’t guarantee it saves time = in the long run because there are usually some surprises in real = life.

------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C469F6.11DCF0A0--