Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b8) with ESMTP id 321528 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:50:32 -0400 Received-SPF: error receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from EDWARD (clt25-78-058.carolina.rr.com [24.25.78.58]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i6EJnRVw026507 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:49:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <003501c469db$acb78880$2402a8c0@EDWARD> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: New Scoop Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:49:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Steve, I personally would not like to see things exceed 200F Max for WOT cruise for any extended time. Your temps do seem a bit high to me for 55% power. I think you can do better. My ideal is 180F for both oil and coolant - that is just my personal preference, not to say there is anything magical about it or that problems will happen if you exceed that. But, I just would not feel comfortable (that all important comfort zone {:>)) with temps exceeding 200F for long periods of time. I think 200F is a reasonable boundary - but, that is just my opinion. others will have a different and equally valid viewpoint. Ed Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Brooks" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 3:19 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Scoop > Ed and John, > I understand that if I have adequate cooling at cruise, it will not enable > me to do an extended climb while keeping temperatures down. At his point, I > seem to have enough cooling to allow me to do a reduced power (55% or so) > cruise. And that is with temperatures toward the upper end of the scale. > > If I can get a 75% power cruise with oil temperature of 200-210 and coolant > of 190-200, I'll be happy. I need to improve my cooling temperatures by a > good 10-15 degrees to accomplish that. > > Is that a reasonable objective, or am I trying to hit a target that is too > low ? It seems to me that 217 oil and 200 coolant is a little on the high > side. And that is at about 55% power. > > If my objectives aren't right, it would be really easy to just raise the > target. In fact, it would make my day. > > Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Ed Anderson > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:43 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Scoop > > > > Sorry to harp on this Steve. I just have a feeling that you're working > hard > > to get the temps lower than they really need to be. If you want minimum > drag > > at cruise, then the temps SHOULD be marginal on a hot day take off and > > climb. So... get the gear up and back off the throttle till you get in > > cooler air at cruise speeds. If necessary give it a rest half way up, or > use > > the technique of doing a long approach to cool off before climbing that > > someone described. If it'll cool ok at full power at cruise height, then > > you're in good shape. My 2c. > > > > John > > > > Steve, I have to agree with John on his main point. Any cooling system is > going to be a compromise. If you design and tailored your cooling system > for cooling in a steep climb on a hot day, you will have excessive cooling > capacity at cruise (read - more cooling drag) than is necessary. On the > other hand if you do optimize for cooling at cruise (min cooling drag) which > is the way a lot of Canard types do as that is one of the reasons for their > choice of aircraft type - high cruise speed, then you will be somewhat short > of cooling capacity needed for take-off/climb. Things like cowl flaps can > help in some cases, but like everything else with an aircraft has benefits > and draw backs - its all a flying compromise. > > So as suggested you can moderate power and/or airspeed during the climb > portion to get through that heat gauntlet and then be set up for lowest > cooling drag at cruise. > > Also, keep in mind, you are probably flying in the hottest time of the year, > so if it will cool adequately now, it will be fine the rest of the time. > > However, if that does not fit with your comfort zone, then you will simple > need to keep plugging away until you get the conditions you are comfortable > with. > > Ed Anderson > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >