Return-Path: Received: from audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.253] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with ESMTP id 147891 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:11:04 -0400 Received: from adsl-69-212-34-255.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([69.212.34.255] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #4) id 1BYXkn-0001YA-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:10:33 -0700 Message-ID: <40C8DBD6.2020700@chartermi.net> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:08:22 -0400 From: "ericruttan@chartermi.net" Reply-To: ericruttan@chartermi.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Detonation References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: f9e70479b5cf6c9fd780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4ba2f0b90b5981ab7b57e7c20bced7b729350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Actually diesel burns faster. High octane burns SLOWER. Thats what octane has come to mean in the modern engine. I never responded to Bulents question, But I cant see 100:1 ratio of anything but water seriously effecting detonation. Jarrett Johnson wrote: > >>Does anybody know if mixing oil in the fuel is beneficial at all in > > delaying > >>detonation? >>Bulent > > > > I've wondered about a Diesel injection system for this. There are some that > use Water/Meth to do it when racing.. what would happen if you used a > Diesel? Would it be worse? I don't know anything about it really.. just that > Diesel usually burns slower.. Usually. > > Jarrett Johnson > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >