Message

Return-Path: Received: from mxsf21.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.221] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with ESMTP id 146419 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:36:07 -0400 Received: from mxip19.cluster1.charter.net (mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.149]) by mxsf21.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59MTdnD031887 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:29:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 68.116.253.147.ts46v-02.dntn.tx.charter.com (HELO office) (68.116.253.147) by mxip19.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2004 18:29:40 -0400 From: "marc" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo boost limits in the EC2 Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:29:22 -0500 Message-ID: <000501c44e71$373ca9d0$6502a8c0@office> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C44E47.4E66A1D0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C44E47.4E66A1D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sounds like a solution to me. But I would have to send his computers back for the new revision! Marc Wiese -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Schemmel, Grant Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 2:53 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo boost limits in the EC2 Absolutely - I'm planning on getting Tracy's EC2 at some point, and anything that simplifies turbo control would be great! Grant Schemmel BD-4 someday, turbo 13b -----Original Message----- From: John Slade [mailto:sladerj@bellsouth.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 1:36 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Turbo boost limits in the EC2 Fellow turbo people, I just had a conversation with Tracy while ordering my EM2. We discussed ways to detect and limit overboost. I suggested that the EC2 is watching MAP anyway, so it could spot a user programmable boost limit - e.g. 50 MAP being exceeded, and cut the training coils until the MAP drops below it. At first glance Tracy felt this was fairly easy to do. He has the MAP data and control of the coils there anyway, so it would just be a few lines of code [my words, not Tracy's] to implement. I agreed with Tracy to run it by the other blow hards to see if there was a consensus on whether this would be worth the effort on his end. Opinions? John Slade (for once, the term blowhards doesn't include Rusty) ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C44E47.4E66A1D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Sounds like a solution to me. But I = would have to send his computers back for the new revision!

Marc Wiese

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Schemmel, Grant
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, = 2004 2:53 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Turbo boost limits in the EC2

Absolutely - I'm planning on = getting Tracy's EC2 at some point, and anything that simplifies turbo control = would be great!

Grant Schemmel

BD-4 someday, turbo = 13b

-----Original = Message-----
From: John Slade [mailto:sladerj@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, = 2004 1:36 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] = Turbo boost limits in the EC2

Fellow turbo = people,

I just had a conversation with = Tracy while ordering my EM2.

We discussed ways to detect and = limit overboost. I suggested that the EC2 is watching MAP anyway, so = it could spot a user programmable boost limit - e.g. 50 MAP being exceeded, = and cut the training coils until the MAP drops below it. At first glance Tracy = felt this was fairly easy to do. He has the MAP data and control of the = coils there anyway, so it would just be a few lines of code = [my words, not Tracy's] to implement.

I agreed with Tracy to run it by = the other blow hards to see if there was a consensus on whether this would be = worth the effort on his end.

Opinions?

John Slade (for once, the term = blowhards doesn't include Rusty)

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C44E47.4E66A1D0--