Return-Path: Received: from mail.tsisp.com ([65.23.108.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with ESMTP-TLS id 141971 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:46:41 -0400 Received: from stevehome by mail.tsisp.com (Technical Support Inc.) with SMTP id CQA74584 for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:46:14 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Brooks" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Not my best landing Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:47:28 -0400 Message-ID: <008201c44c0f$dd61efa0$6400a8c0@WORKGROUP.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Terry, Thanks for the advice. I will definitely do the coin test to see if there is any damage. The nose didn't hit very hard, so I hope that there isn't any. I think that gear was in the process of extending when it hit, which mitigated the damage. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Terry L Schubert Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 5:22 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Not my best landing Dear Steve, I guess you are feeling badly enough about your landing. I did mine on the 3rd flight. PLEASE do not believe you "have it out of your system"! My next gear up landing was at OSH with 15,000 witnesses and a 20kt cross wind. "There are those who have and those that will and those that will land gear up AGAIN!" When a Cozy lands gear up it puts considerable pressure on the side skin under the canard. I suggest you do a coin tap test for delaminations in the area directly under the canard to about a foot below the canard. That is the usual damage area. Damage is not noticeable until you do that. Landing distractions will continue to occur. I recommend you get that warning system & AEX made fool proof. Best wishes, Terry Schubert Central States Association Newsletter Editor On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:19:14 -0400 "Steve Brooks" writes: > I made my 6th flight today, and after flying for .8 hours, came in to > land > after I noticed that I had a vacuum failure, and did not put the > nose gear > down. Talk about running my day, it definitely was not good, but > could have > been much worse. > > I was evidently distracted by wondering about what happened to the > vacuum, > instead of doing my landing checklist. I was worried that I could > have lost > a belt, so I was keeping a watchful eye on the temperatures. I > did, > however, turn on the boost pump, and check fuel. I haven't been > used to > having to put the gear down, and coupled with the distraction, and > stupidity, was the formal for a problem. > > I came in high and a little on the fast side, in fact, I couldn't > figure out > why I wasn't descending, and bleeding speed. How about the fact > that the > gear was up. I was deploying both rudders, and marveling over how > well that > worked to get the altitude problem solved. Apparently the AEX was > in the > process of extending the gear when I touched down, which probably > saved me > from allot more damage. I landed a little faster than I had been, > and sat > it down without letting it float along like all of my other > landings. If I > had landed like I did before, the extra 4 or 5 seconds could have > let the > gear get all the way down...but it didn't. > > Damage was really no too bad. Ground off the face of the landing > gear strut > about 1/8" ground the front of the castoring nose wheel casting flat > in one > spot, and ground off about half of the hockey puck. As soon as I > realized > what had happened, I pulled back all the way on the elevator, and > hit the > nose gear switch, which was already turning. The nose came up and I > was > still rolling at maybe 20-30 MPH. I pulled off on a taxiway, shut > down, and > got out to inspect the damage. I expected the worst, but really was > pretty > minimal. I decided that everything was good enough to taxi back to > the > hanger, where I pulled the nose cover to check for any other > damage. > Everything inside looked fine. The nose lift is fine. The landing > gear > strut will have to be replaced, as well as the lower casting on the > nose > wheel assembly. I may forget allot of things in the future, but > I'll bet > that landing gear won't be one of them. > > I pulled the engine cowling, and the belt on the smog pump that I > use for > vacuum was fine, so I still don't know the cause of the vacuum > problem. I > need to pull the canard, and I/P cover anyway to troubleshoot a NAV > system > problem, so I'll get to the bottom of it when I do that. I'll have > plenty > of time while I'm waiting on parts. > The only damage to the nose at all was a couple of cracks in the > micro > around the hockey puck. I'll have to sand it down to get the rest > of the > puck off anyways, so that isn't a big deal. > > The good news is that my noise in the right main wheel is fixed. I > took it > apart, really didn't find anything, but I repacked the bearings, and > put it > all back together and the noise is gone. I guess that it must have > been an > alignment issue with the disk or something. I was careful to snug > the bolts > with the same torque while mounting the disk to the wheel. I think > that may > have been the issue. > > Also the engine continues to run superbly. I still am running > warmer than I > like, but I have a plan to remedy that. The rotary engine is so > smooth and > quiet that you forget it's running almost. > > Steve Brooks > Cozy MKIV N75CZ > Turbo rotary > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html