Return-Path: Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.50] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b4) with ESMTP id 124005 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:33:33 -0400 Received: from user-2injr79.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.236.233] helo=Carol) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BWHcs-0007AY-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:33:02 -0700 Message-ID: <003901c44a51$967c6e40$0000a398@Carol> From: "sqpilot@earthlink" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo boost limits in the EC2 Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 11:32:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2739.300 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Robert" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 6:38 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo boost limits in the EC2 > John Slade wrote: > > >>Cutting fuel till the MAP comes down is the only workable solution I can > >>see. > >> > >> > >Yes, I tend to agree. Tracy - are you listening? Does this make sense to > >you? > >Anyone else care to comment? I'd really like to get something built into the > >EC2....soon. > >Regards, > >John > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>> > Again, - I'm speaking auto use - you have to be very careful using fuel > cut in a boosted rotary, all it takes is a couple of hard knocks > instigated by a transient lean condition to break apex seals. There's > plenty of fuel coating the inside of the manifold, etc., to do this even > if you shut the injectors completely off. It's a very short phenemenon > but it is there. Another thing - hard fuel cuts are scary in a car, I > would imagine the soiled underwear factor is quite a bit higher while > flying when you hit cut. I use hard fuel cut as a rev limiter in my NA > and it STILL gets my attention. That said, I believe Tracy's ECU manages > spark as well as fuel. Random spark cut and/or massive retard may be the > way to cut your boost in those temporary situations. > > -Mike > Hi, Mike....my concern is that if you cut spark, and still have fuel going into the engine, you may end up with a flooded engine, or worse yet, a terrific backfire due to the excessive fuel build-up then reintroducing spark. I used to take my 1960 Ford, coast down a large hill with the ignition off (standard transmission in gear), then turn the key back on, and scare everyone with the loud backfire. Did that until I blew my muffler right down the seam one day. Got too expensive for a 16 year-old (expensive firecrackers). Just another consideration. Paul Conner, MicroTech ECU with fuel cut boost limiter. > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >