Return-Path: Received: from mail.tsisp.com ([65.23.108.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b4) with ESMTP-TLS id 123486 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:52:03 -0400 Received: from stevehome by mail.tsisp.com (Technical Support Inc.) with SMTP id CQA74584 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:51:34 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Steve Brooks" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo boost limits in the EC2 Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 07:54:54 -0400 Message-ID: <002701c44a2a$c0ce3d80$6400a8c0@WORKGROUP.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: I would rather opt for something that reduced power, not cutting it. I don't think that I want to be climbing out at 200' AGL, and have the fuel cut off. Even if I did get down OK, cleaning the inside of the plane would be a major project. Either air or fuel would be difficult to control. Cutting off a set of plugs, or maybe retarding the timing would seem like easier solutions, and also easier on the upholstery. Steve Brooks -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of John Slade Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:34 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo boost limits in the EC2 > Cutting fuel till the MAP comes down is the only workable solution I can > see. Yes, I tend to agree. Tracy - are you listening? Does this make sense to you? Anyone else care to comment? I'd really like to get something built into the EC2....soon. Regards, John >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html