Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #8799
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: 3rd flight
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 07:47:39 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Steve, one possibility is that the Ivo prop’s root section is creating back pressure in flight. Years ago some canard flyers did testing in flight and found there was reverse flow around the hub area. Ivo prop’s first 1/3section from the hub has very little pitch, and the faster you go, it acts more like flat disk.
Bulent
  
 
Steve,
 
I agree that you should have enough exit area.  Bulent may be onto something with the prop theory.  In tractor type planes, the IVO is believed to create a lot of drag around the hub, which keeps the top speed down.  I always figured that canards were immune to this, since the fuselage blocked the draggy area of the hub.  Now that I think about it, I believe Tracy mentioned that it had an adverse effect on his cooling flow as well,  and his inlet, is your outlet.  
 
If this continues to be a problem, can you borrow a prop from someone else as a test?  This will be much easier for people using the -C box, since it will be the same as a Lycoming.  I guess a -B canard can exchange with a tractor Lycoming.  Man, starting to get dizzy thinking of this :-)
 
Good luck,
Rusty
   
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster