Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.117] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b3) with ESMTP id 83712 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 May 2004 02:02:24 -0400 Received: from 204.127.135.75 ([204.127.135.75]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP id <2004052206022411300nf6gve>; Sat, 22 May 2004 06:02:24 +0000 Received: from [209.247.222.105] by 204.127.135.75; Sat, 22 May 2004 06:02:23 +0000 From: keltro@att.net To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: engine mount geometry Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 06:02:23 +0000 Message-Id: <052220040602.13356.40AEECEF000B51530000342C2160466648FF908D8B939A@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Mar 24 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= Kevin, Ditto the advise from Marv! The Dyke Delta has its offset at the firewall end of the engine keeping the prop flange on the A/C centerline. FWIW Kelly Troyer -- Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 > "kevin lane" wrote: > > > > > I am fabricating the bed mount plate for my 20B in an rv-8. my > understanding, from Tracy's advice, is to offset the engine about 1 1/2 > degrees to the right if I use his 2.85 drive. as I see it there is a > centerline of the fuselage and a centerline of the engine/redrive. if I > mount them such that they are 1 1/2 degrees out of parallel, then those > centerlines will intersect. my question is where? ...snip... < < < > > > I'm not an RV builder, but I did have the same decision to make when I was > fabricating the mount for the 13B in my Lancair LNC2. I temporarily installed > the cowling to the fuselage and found that in its normal position the > centerline of the fuselage aligned perfectly with the centerline of the cowl. > I also noticed that there was a tilt to the flat face that would mate up with > the spinner, so I assumed that the c/l of the prop should match the c/l of the > fuselage, consequently when I built the mount all the offset was at the rear > of the engine. The center of the prop hub is aligned with the c/l of the > fuselage. From an aerodynamic standpoint, I don't know that it makes much > difference where the offset comes from, except that if you keep the firewall > end of the engine centered on the firewall, the c/l of the prop will be offset > to the left or right, as required. This would impact how the cowling fits up > to the fuselage and give you a convex surface on one side and a concave > surface on the other where the cowling meets the fuse (when viewed from above > or below). Personally, I'd prefer to keep the lines of the fuselage nice and > smooth and symmetrical so aligned the prop hub's and fuselage's c/l's. What > happens under the cowling has little impact on the final external appearance, > ergo, I build in the offset back where it would be invisible. Just my 2c. > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html