Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #7914
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Tracy's dyno test- universal intake comments
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 09:01:52 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Keep in mind that Tracy has tuned intake and exhaust.
How far away from the exhaust ports do you join the headers into one?
I've been told that you can gain as much as 20 HP with the tuned exhaust. 
 
Racing Beat says 22-25 inches, and I believe mine came out closer to 30".  I believe Tracy has had a few different lengths over the years, and said it didn't make any noticeable difference.  Hopefully, he'll correct me if that's not a true statement.   

On the intake, it doesn't have to wrap over the engine. It could stay on the intake side. From the ports all the way out to the cowl cheek and back. Or you could make a "snail" as PL suggested - basically bending the tubes into a circle. In the last case it will probably be better to have butterfly valves near the ports. I'm thinking a 3/8" to 1/2" thick manifold flange should be thick enough to hold 4 or 6 butterfly valves and their shafts. 
 
I've been planning to make a short intake, with a two throat TWM TB, and figured that I can extend the tubes on the air intake side to attempt some tuning.  The convenient way to do this is with flexible tubing, which can conform to any reasonable shape to clear obstacles.   
 
Now that you mention it, an almost universal intake "system" could be made about like you suggested.  We would need an intake flange that was thick enough to include 4 butterflies, and 4 injectors (at least two if you prefer to use the stock injectors in the block).  It would have hose flanges on the inlet side to accept flexible hose.  On the other end, would be a resonant chamber, with 4 hose flanges as well.  These two parts could be positioned as space allows, and the hoses connecting the two parts could be different lengths as needed.  
 
I'm going to keep thinking about this, but I fear that making the intake flange portion is beyond my machining capabilities.  Also, the primary ports are so close together, that it would be tricky to getting two butterflies to fit close to the block.  Once you start moving them out away from the block, it becomes a short intake, rather than a plate.  Very interesting thoughts though.  Thanks.    

I now have a new excuse for holding off on changing to tuned intake and EFI: waiting to see what Tracy comes up with next.

Is Tracy's new intake for his current engine, or the Renesis, or maybe the 20B?  With all the projects he has going, I can't imagine him spending time making an intake for the 13B, when he's more interested in getting the Renesis installed.  So go ahead and order a new Renesis Finn, and you'll be ready when Tracy gets the intake done :-)
 
BTW, what do you get for static rpm Finn?  Best I can tell, you have 3 more inches of pitch than Tracy's old prop, but with the same diameter. 
 
Rusty (scaring myself and the airport neighbors later) 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster