Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 3209988 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 07 May 2004 01:42:45 -0400 Received: from BigAl ([68.107.116.221]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040507054242.HCNE20308.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@BigAl> for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 01:42:42 -0400 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: 20B - torsional vibration Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 22:42:59 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c433f6$28337990$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C433BB.7BD4A190" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C433BB.7BD4A190 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 20B - torsional vibration =20 Powersport tests were found to be faulty by dint of the fact that they = used a piston engine coupling to the dyno. The shaft excited itself and = busted several times, and they blamed the engine. Torsional reversals are not a problem on a rotary-there aren't any, but there is some harmonic = vibrations, easily tamed. Completely different animal. Mazda did have some flexing problems on the early 20 shafts, they were all recalled or replaced. The forgings, metallurgy, and some details were changed. =20 Marc Wiese =20 =20 Obviously I'm hopeful as well that we won't run into any problems, but = in spite of Paul Lamar's dismissal; I know just enough about vibration analysis, and the risk of resonances to suggest we be wary until proven we're in the clear. I guess you are referring to Powersport tests that = were done 8-10 years ago. The coupling to a dyno is pretty much independent = of engine type, however it is possible to have a shaft/coupling/brake = system that could have a resonance frequency with the engine in either case, = and break something. They had no such problems with the 20B tests. A shaft can't excite itself; it has to have a driving frequency. =20 Torsional reversals are not required for a torsional vibration resonance = - torsional vibration is there regardless, and a resonant frequency in the system can cause things to break. Torque reversals do aggravate the situation. Vibration by itself isn't the issue - it's the potential for exiciting a resonance that can multiply forces by large factors that is = the concern. =20 Barney, you're right; harmonic dampers (especially non-viscous types) = need to be tuned to the specific system, so the powersport unit isn't of much interest. =20 Fluidampr.com (used to be part of vibratec) makes viscous dampers for a number of engines (none for a rotary), including one for Honda which may = be adaptable. But as you say, there isn't data that says we need it, so I guess we'll wait and see. I'm just suggesting that we proceed with some caution, and hopefully avoid any unpleasant surprises. When I get my = engine running on the plane I'll be watching for the behavior I saw on the dyno = on the drive belts; and will try to find some means for measuring the deflection in the elastomer bushings in the drive. That could provide = some good info. =20 Al ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C433BB.7BD4A190 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 20B - torsional vibration

 

Powersport tests = were found to be faulty by dint of the fact that they used a piston engine = coupling to the dyno. The shaft excited itself and busted several times, and they = blamed the engine. Torsional reversals are not a problem on a rotary-there aren’t any, but there is some harmonic vibrations, easily tamed. Completely different animal. Mazda did have some flexing problems on the = early 20 shafts, they were all recalled or replaced. The forgings, metallurgy, = and some details were changed.

 

Marc Wiese

 

 

Obviously = I’m hopeful as well that we won’t run into any problems, but in spite = of Paul Lamar’s dismissal; I know just enough about vibration analysis, = and the risk of resonances to suggest we be wary until proven we’re in the = clear.  I guess you are referring to Powersport tests that were done 8-10 years ago.  The coupling to a dyno is pretty much independent of engine = type, however it is possible to have a shaft/coupling/brake system that could = have a resonance frequency with the engine in either case, and break = something.  They had no such problems with the 20B tests.  A shaft can’t = excite itself; it has to have a driving frequency. 

Torsional = reversals are not required for a torsional vibration resonance – torsional = vibration is there regardless, and a resonant frequency in the system can cause = things to break.  Torque reversals do aggravate the situation.  = Vibration by itself isn’t the issue – it’s the potential for = exiciting a resonance that can multiply forces by large factors that is the = concern.

 

Barney, = you’re right; harmonic dampers (especially non-viscous types) need to be tuned = to the specific system, so the powersport unit isn’t of much = interest.

 

Fluidampr.com = (used to be part of vibratec) makes viscous dampers for a number of engines (none = for a rotary), including one for Honda which may be adaptable.  But as = you say, there isn’t data that says we need it, so I guess we’ll wait = and see.  I’m just suggesting that we proceed with some caution, = and hopefully avoid any unpleasant surprises.  When I get my engine = running on the plane I’ll be watching for the behavior I saw on the dyno on = the drive belts; and will try to find some means for measuring the = deflection in the elastomer bushings in the drive.  That could provide some good = info.

 

Al

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C433BB.7BD4A190--