Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 3183485 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:18:45 -0400 Received: from nc.rr.com (cpe-024-211-178-221.nc.rr.com [24.211.178.221]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i3M1IhC8018184 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:18:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <408718E9.6010501@nc.rr.com> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:59:21 -0400 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Performance Props References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Perry Mick wrote: > > You are right, I wouldn't repitch a composite prop. I would just build > another one. I was asking for information from Bulent so I could work up > some numbers for him to build a new prop to. > > Perry > > > Thank you. I plan on experimenting at some point, so what I'll most likely do is start with a wood prop till I'm happy and then switch to glass. -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber