Return-Path: Received: from [206.228.212.23] (HELO mail.statesville.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3144287 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:51:26 -0500 Received: from TWJames [63.162.171.178] by mail.statesville.net (SMTPD32-8.05) id A28E2F40196; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:54:22 -0500 From: "Tommy James" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Duh? Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 16:51:26 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01C4199B.E71D0300" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 63.162.171.178 with no reverse DNS entry. X-Declude-Sender: twjames@statesville.net [63.162.171.178] X-Note: Scanned for Spam This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C4199B.E71D0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OhYeah! I forgot about the manifold pressure port... TJ -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Tracy Crook Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 4:25 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Rusty's O2 / EM2 problems. Tracy and all, I have an auto stock fuel pressure regulator which has seemed to funtion properly, but I am not satisfied with performance, i.e., inconsistent and proper mixture control. 1. Would a MAP compensated fuel pressure regulator be a benefit? 2. Depends on the answers I get...:-) Tommy James<>< There are too many possible reasons for inconsistent mixture to say that the reason is an uncompensated fuel pressure regulator but the system was designed with this type in mind. But what do you mean by "auto stock" ? The stock Mazda regulator is manifold pressure compensated. Is yours a three port regulator with a connection to the manifold? Tracy I've lost count of the number of builders that had this problem due to not connecting the manifold pressure sensor, wrong pressure regulator, no pressure regulator, primary injectors too large, regulator set too high, not using a MAP compensated fuel pressure regulator, (list is endless, or so it seems). Tracy ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C4199B.E71D0300 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

OhYeah! I = forgot about=20 the manifold pressure port...

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors = in=20 aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Tracy = Crook
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 4:25 PM
To: = Rotary=20 motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Rusty's O2 / EM2 = problems.

Tracy and = all,=20

I have an auto stock fuel = pressure=20 regulator which has seemed to funtion properly, but I am not = satisfied with=20 performance, i.e., inconsistent and proper mixture control. =20

1. Would a MAP compensated = fuel pressure=20 regulator be a benefit?

2. Depends on the answers I=20 get...:-)

Tommy = James<><

There are too many possible = reasons for=20 inconsistent mixture to say that the reason is an uncompensated fuel = pressure regulator but the system was designed with this type in=20 mind.

But what do you mean by "auto = stock"=20 ? The stock Mazda regulator is manifold pressure = compensated. Is=20 yours a three port regulator with a connection to the = manifold?

Tracy

I've lost count=20 of the number of builders that had this problem due to not = connecting the=20 manifold pressure sensor, wrong pressure regulator, no pressure = regulator,=20 primary injectors too large, regulator set too high, not = using a MAP=20 compensated fuel pressure regulator, (list is endless, or so it=20 seems).

Tracy

= ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C4199B.E71D0300-- --- [Pre-scanned for viruses by Internet America.]