Return-Path: Received: from [65.54.169.89] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3144273 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:24:37 -0500 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 13:24:36 -0800 Received: from 4.174.4.203 by bay3-dav59.adinternal.hotmail.com with DAV; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 21:24:36 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [4.174.4.203] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com From: "Tracy Crook" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rusty's O2 / EM2 problems. Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 16:24:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 7.02.0011.2700 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0000_01C41998.273E6360" Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2004 21:24:36.0466 (UTC) FILETIME=[10841D20:01C419C2] ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C41998.273E6360 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tracy and all, =20 I have an auto stock fuel pressure regulator which has seemed to funtion = properly, but I am not satisfied with performance, i.e., inconsistent and= proper mixture control. =20 1. Would a MAP compensated fuel pressure regulator be a benefit? 2. Depends on the answers I get...:-) Tommy James<>< There are too many possible reasons for inconsistent mixture to say that = the reason is an uncompensated fuel pressure regulator but the system was= designed with this type in mind. =20 But what do you mean by "auto stock" ? The stock Mazda regulator is mani= fold pressure compensated. Is yours a three port regulator with a connec= tion to the manifold? Tracy I've lost count of the number of builders that had this problem due to n= ot connecting the manifold pressure sensor, wrong pressure regulator, no = pressure regulator, primary injectors too large, regulator set too high,= not using a MAP compensated fuel pressure regulator, (list is endless, o= r so it seems). Tracy ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C41998.273E6360 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<= DIV>

=

Tracy and = all,

I have an= auto stock fuel pressure regulator which has seemed to funtion properly,= but I am not satisfied with performance, i.e., inconsistent and proper m= ixture control.

1. Would a MAP compensated fuel pressure regulator be a benefit?<= /DIV>
2. Depends on the answers I g= et...:-)

Tommy James&l= t;><

&nbs= p;

There are too many possibl= e reasons for inconsistent mixture to say that the reason is an uncompens= ated fuel pressure regulator but the system was designed with this type i= n mind.

&= nbsp;

But what do you mean by= "auto stock" ? The stock Mazda regulator is manifold pressure comp= ensated. Is yours a three port regulator with a connection to the m= anifold?

=

Tracy

I've lost count of the number of builders= that had this problem due to not connecting the manifold pressure sensor= , wrong pressure regulator, no pressure regulator, primary injectors too = large, regulator set too high, not using a MAP compensated fuel pre= ssure regulator, (list is endless, or so it seems).

Tracy

------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C41998.273E6360--