Return-Path: Received: from [206.228.212.23] (HELO mail.statesville.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3143966 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 10:57:06 -0500 Received: from TWJames [63.162.171.178] by mail.statesville.net (SMTPD32-8.05) id AF852B37005C; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 11:00:05 -0500 From: "Tommy James" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Rusty's O2 / EM2 problems. Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 10:57:08 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01C4196A.68A247F0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 63.162.171.178 with no reverse DNS entry. X-Declude-Sender: twjames@statesville.net [63.162.171.178] X-Note: Scanned for Spam This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C4196A.68A247F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tracy and all, I have an auto stock fuel pressure regulator which has seemed to funtion properly, but I am not satisfied with performance, i.e., inconsistent and proper mixture control. 1. Would a MAP compensated fuel pressure regulator be a benefit? 2. Depends on the answers I get...:-) Tommy James<>< I've lost count of the number of builders that had this problem due to not connecting the manifold pressure sensor, wrong pressure regulator, no pressure regulator, primary injectors too large, regulator set too high, not using a MAP compensated fuel pressure regulator, (list is endless, or so it seems). Tracy ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C4196A.68A247F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tracy and = all,=20

I have an auto stock fuel pressure = regulator=20 which has seemed to funtion properly, but I am not satisfied with = performance,=20 i.e., inconsistent and proper mixture control.

1. Would a MAP compensated fuel = pressure=20 regulator be a benefit?

2. Depends on the answers I=20 get...:-)

Tommy = James<><

I've = lost count of=20 the number of builders that had this problem due to not connecting the = manifold pressure sensor, wrong pressure regulator, no pressure = regulator,=20 primary injectors too large, regulator set too high, not using a = MAP=20 compensated fuel pressure regulator, (list is endless, or so it = seems).

Tracy

------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C4196A.68A247F0-- --- [Pre-scanned for viruses by Internet America.]